The Wisdom of Nonsense

The Courage to Choose Chaos: A Vision of Collective Power

Alright, maybe it’s time to start listening to the news again. 

It’s been getting pretty hilarious these past few days. I don’t know if it’s just me, but it seems to have become a source of serious laughter by now.

…

Some people seem surprised by the results. Some don’t seem to understand.

Others talk about fear, recklessness, madness, and all sorts of things. Some speak of freedom, simplicity, and an incredibly "macro" transformation. People talk about a lot of things, but often with very little logic or coherence.

Most people who publicly voice their opinion or judgment about the elections are really just talking about themselves, their own limiting beliefs, their own judgments, and their unconscious fears or desires. 

Most of them don’t understand politics enough to have a sensible conversation, so they can only echo what they fear most or unconsciously judge in their own small minds. 

They’re only able to think “micro” within their own worldview, yet they allow themselves to pass “macro” judgment on others as if they know what they’re talking about.

Entire nations speak exactly like individuals — mostly about themselves.

When a country judges what’s happening with its neighbors, it often says more about its own state of consciousness than about that of the neighbors. Because when they speak about someone else like that, they become transparently clear about their own social conditioning and deep beliefs. 

It has nothing to do with the neighbor or the type of archetype now in power there. Judging others and spending time trying to understand a reality one doesn’t live oneself is pointless. To put it politely, your personal opinion is completely irrelevant here.

You're wasting your energy trying to understand something as hyper-complex as the politics of a global power with a very limited, egocentric, naive, and overly simplistic perspective. 

It’s like asking a humanities student in college to verify the technical plans of a plane to ensure its performance and in-flight safety. 

The student may well do it if they wish, but I think no one would really care about their technical analysis before boarding the plane. Because they lack the knowledge, expertise, and experience required to perform such a task or analysis, so their opinion is of no use to us.

The student is wasting their time trying to grasp a complexity that clearly exceeds them, and those who read their "analyses" based on opinion alone are also wasting their time, because the information provided will have no impact on our real decisions and choices. After all, we’ll always listen to the experts’ opinions, even if we don’t understand their technical jargon, before boarding a plane.

In reality, it’s the same thing with politics.

Everyone complains, and everyone can have a personal opinion on anything, but we end up co-creating political systems that mirror ourselves — those that frighten us the least, in the end.

We end up choosing "experts."

When it comes to a plane, it’s very easy to identify your area of expertise and your goal. You know your role and your limitations very clearly and precisely. 

You might be a global expert on screw no. 36 of the left wing or on a very specific technology, and your goal is always the same as that of thousands of other experts like you: to ensure that the plane reaches its destination safely, from point A to point B.

More than a thousand specialized engineers can work in a synchronized, highly organized way on a single product and guarantee that the final product will meet its objectives and be the safest possible mode of transport — even though it’s literally a metal "machine" flying through the air.

This works for a plane because there are a few key elements they’ve understood in their very complex co-creation process.

Firstly, they all share the same goal and a clear vision: a plane that flies safely. The vision and goal are simple and direct for everyone, even if the project itself — building a reliable plane — is incredibly complex and complicated. 

No one can question this goal, no matter how tempted they might be to be corrupted or influenced by others or by the system. The vision that unites them takes precedence over everything else.

Secondly, to succeed, they have no choice but to trust each other’s respective expertise. The engineer responsible for the engine has to trust completely that the one designing the wings knows what they’re talking about. They have to trust even if they don’t understand anything about the other’s technical language or expertise.

However, the level of trust required to co-create projects as complex as a plane doesn’t just grow on trees. This kind of unconditional trust within such a hyper-complex system is extremely difficult to build and maintain. It’s something that has to be cultivated and nourished continuously.

This brings us to the third key element in this "simple" recipe for managing complex systems: collaboration. 

To build trust, they need to know each other better.

The most effective way to know each other is to co-create projects together or actively collaborate on initiatives that exceed our current understanding of reality. 

The more they practice co-creating the impossible together, the more they trust each other unconditionally and naturally. The more they trust each other, the more complex and meaningful the projects they’ll implement will be.

It’s the logic of the exponential evolution of consciousness itself.

It becomes increasingly complex, meaningful, and sophisticated if the three conditions are respected and maintained simultaneously: shared vision, trust, and collaboration. 

It’s true for a plane, and it’s true for any system.

Now, let’s turn back to politics. 

.

What is the clear vision and simple goal of our political system? 

.

The fact that most people can’t even answer this question makes any deeper analysis pointless. 

If the public itself doesn’t understand what the government they elect is truly meant to do, nor the real objectives to achieve, then how can they trust it to execute this vision safely? 

How can the population collaborate with its own government in a coherent, logical, and effective way if they don’t even know the shared purpose or destination, we are all moving toward together? 

If people don’t have a clear understanding of the common project their community is currently co-creating for everyone, how can they contribute to it in a sensible and coherent way? 

This is where the true problem of politics lies. 

Politics lack trust and collaboration, primarily due to a glaring lack of clarity, coherence, and consistency in its shared vision and primary purpose. 

To understand more easily what’s happening today in the political realm, we must learn to analyze it by applying a "reverse engineering" approach. 

Instead of asking how this is possible and complaining, we should be asking why it is this way. What makes some strategies work while others fail? We can continue judging our neighbors, or we can show wisdom by trying to analyze the situation in reverse. 

How is it that this archetype has managed, despite everything, to achieve this level of collective trust and collaboration necessary to accomplish its goals and vision? What exactly is this vision? 

We don’t really know, but most have decided that this person is the best suited to carry it out at the moment.

Remember that genuine trust is something that cannot be manipulated or "faked." It happens on a feeling level. 

People have chosen their leaders. We have no choice but to trust their judgment and respect their decisions. 

Moreover, we don’t live there, so in theory, it shouldn’t concern us so much. The fact that it has a major impact and represents a risk for our own internal politics is a consequence of our lack of economic resilience and strategic sovereignty up until now, not really the problem of our neighbors. 

It’s our lack of backbone and uncertainty about what we really want. 

So, thank you to the news for highlighting what other countries actually need to see in their own mirror of collective unconsciousness and ignorance. 

Thank you to our neighbors for showing exactly where each country could see itself more clearly and reclaim some of its power to manage the affairs of its own people before meddling in humanity’s broader issues. 

… 

To understand the success of any given archetype, one must observe the system in which it operates. If this system has granted it so much power, it is necessarily because it trusts it. 

So, the real question is: why, and specifically on what basis, does the system place so much trust in it? 

This is a very challenging question and probably won’t be discussed in depth in mainstream media. 

The leader in question responds perfectly to a pressing and important collective need within their macro-community, but the problem is that no one seems to understand or clearly name this need, which makes the leader so resilient and extraordinarily powerful, no matter what they do or say. 

It is the clarity and consistency of their collective vision — both simple and unifying — that has conferred this power. They embody a truth that resonates deeply with the macro-level belief system of the population that has chosen them. 

What we are seeking here isn’t the personal motivation of this archetype nor our limited personal judgment of their public persona. What we’re missing in this analysis is the true collective need they have so well understood, to the point that intelligent and powerful individuals trust them and are ready to collaborate with them to implement their vision and strategy. 

Perhaps, to some, the "character" itself doesn’t make much sense, and some may even deeply dislike them. However, at this point, no one can deny that their vision seems broadly shared and supported by many. 

.

So, what is this mysterious need?

.

At this point, we enter pure speculation, as I have no personal insight into the true needs of a population I don’t know firsthand. But, by observing carefully, we can still discern trends and clear patterns emerging.

Imagine the country as a whole, like a living being.

Imagine this being going through its own process of self-realization. Just like an individual, a country has its own Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, which the population uses to evolve and continually develop.

What is the current state of this hierarchy of needs in each country, and what strategies are their governments putting in place to ensure that the entire population can transform, transcend, and fulfill itself safely and peacefully in the future?

The true strategic genius of the newly elected leader is purely psychological.

If we read between the lines and explore the forest of our own unconscious with a bit more courage, we might glimpse something incredibly simple and logical.

What our neighbors have chosen is not a political leader in the usual sense.

He isn’t a leader because that’s not what his population needs right now.

He is a radical innovator of the macro-system. He is there to transform, not to repeat the same patterns. He is there to change things fundamentally, not to reassure the masses with the same speeches over and over.

He isn’t there to preserve the status quo but to disrupt it.

Our neighbors did not choose the safety of the familiar order. They had the courage and audacity to place the unexpected and the unknown at the helm of their ship.

They didn’t choose a leader; they chose change.

They decided to trust in the archetype of "chaos" and radical transformation as the guide of their collective vision. Honestly, this requires an incredible amount of courage for a population that still plays a central role in global power today.

Bravo to them for this "leap of faith into the deep unknown."

...

Our neighbors did not choose a person for what he says, thinks, or does privately; they chose him for what he allows them to achieve now.

For the substance and logic of his global vision, not for the trivial details of his personality or the superficial analysis of his "tweets." He returns real power and freedom to his population. This is the fundamental need he has so accurately understood.

He knows that the only way to survive is to give people back their own power, rather than concentrating it in soulless institutions.

In such an unstable and unpredictable global economy, it makes sense for a world power to ensure its population can meet its basic needs coherently, safely, and ideally on its own soil.

When the world trembles, everyone thinks first about protecting their own.

That’s what he’s doing.

His strategy aims to reposition his population by restoring and redistributing local power to it, with more efficiency, simplicity, and resilience, rather than pursuing a dominant role on the world stage.

He understands the real cost his country bears when it is seen as responsible for global chaos. He doesn’t seek to be the "master of the world" but wants his people to become sovereign and self-reliant, accountable for their own future.

He would rather teach his citizens to manage their country with integrity and efficiency before asking them to tackle global problems.

A population that takes back its power from the global system and can meet fundamental needs autonomously and peacefully is extremely powerful.

My personal reflection brings up an unanswered question here: Do we have the courage to honestly ask ourselves if, in our own community and country, we feel empowered to change our local environment? Do we have the means and knowledge to co-create a system that truly meets our country’s real and concrete needs ?

The judgments we see in the news at the moment are primarily reactions of fear. Fear of what it would mean for us if our neighbor stops "protecting" us and dictating what we should do.

The truth is, here, we are still far from true freedom and collective sovereignty. We still seek comforting and "politically correct" leaders who tell us everything will be fine, but we are not yet ready to become our own masters.

We keep criticizing the choices of others, but what are we actually creating here for our own community and people?

How are we empowering each citizen to contribute to our shared project of evolution?

Do we know how to meet the authentic needs of our own people without exploiting or abusing others?

Are we capable of true sovereignty and abundance while remaining peaceful and responsible ourselves?

We may not yet be fully ready for a radical change where everyone becomes an active participant in our shared future—a future based on true freedom, shared sovereignty, and a collective reclaiming of power.

My personal analysis, as limited as it may be, becomes evident when we take the time to read the news from recent days. In truth, everyone is talking about themselves. One just has to know how to read with the heart, rather than through the filter of our fears, insecurities, and limiting beliefs.

With current trends, we too will be forced to think for ourselves and consider our population’s true needs. What vision and collective strategy do we aspire to for our future?

Who do we want in power next, and how?

...

Before criticizing the choices of our neighbors, we should seriously examine the real state of our own spheres of influence, ensure our own harvests, and sow seeds for the future.

Looking in the mirror, reclaiming our collective power, and taking responsibility for our own future is far harder than critiquing what "others" are doing.

Judging is an understandable reaction. But just because it’s understandable doesn’t make it logical, productive, or even fair.